Names
I’ve had a handful of names throughout my life.
I was born “The [Mom's Maiden Name] Girl.” My mother had not yet picked out a first name for me. She was living in a hole-in-the-wall shack in a poorer town in agricultural central California — it was where she ended up after my father kicked her out upon discovering her pregnancy. Get an abortion or hit the road, he said. I knew this as a child, but it wasn’t until I grew older that my mother also informed me that he was threatening to beat her, to punch and stomp on her stomach to forcibly terminate the pregnancy. He tried to send her out with no belongings in a scrap car — which was to get her from her then-home on the northern border of Oregon to her adult sons’ home in central California. That’s over 900 miles. She was 43 years old and not in the best of health. My oldest brother — something of a giant — had to gather some friends to physically threaten my father for him to make sure that she was able to make the trip safely.
I’ve never had a moment’s contact with him. My mother claims that when I was around six years old, he called her, having “dropped by” and wanted to take me out for some ice cream with his new girlfriend (with whom he had been involved during the short months my mother was married to him). Fearing for my safe return, she refused. And never heard from him again.
During my first months, my adult sister lived with us — she has told me stories of having to brush cockroaches off of me while I slept. And it wouldn’t be until I entered adolescence that my mother and I settled down in a permanent home: before that, there was not one residence I was able to stay for more than a single year’s time; we hopped around looking for the lowest rents, and spent time living in spare rooms in each of my adult brothers’ homes (three times with one, once with the other).
When I was five years old, my mother married a long-time family friend. When she did so, he legally adopted me, claiming to be my father and being added to my birth certificate as such — whether my mother just went along with this or actively sought it for reasons of future security, I don’t know. Regardless, my name at the time changed from [Mom's Maiden Name] to [This Man's Name].
A little less than a year later, after struggling with him over finances — he wanted her to continue working to support his retirement, with no support for either her nor I — she divorced him. And there, a problem cropped up: in order to get my name changed back to my birth name, she would have to go to court to prove that he was not, in fact, my biological father, and have him removed from my birth certificate. As a newly single mother, she did not have the resources to take on that task. So, even after the divorce was finalized, I remained [This Man's Name] — and she kept that name as well in the interests of having the same name as her daughter.
And that name remained mine for the rest of my childhood, adolescence and early adult life. I hated it. I hated the sound of it, I hated the man it came from, I hated the way he had treated her, I hated the way we were stuck carrying his family name despite having no ties to this family whatsoever.
Ever since I can remember, I have been very eager to get rid of that name.
And ever since I remember, I have been wholly uninterested in weddings and traditional family life. I had no interest in boys or girls as a teenager. I never dreamed about “my day,” about dresses and flowers and music, about honeymoons and housewifery.
Part of that, especially as I grew older, was that I had a distinct sense of my undesirability. I wasn’t interested in anyone else because I thought no one else would be interested in me. As I grew more aware of my health and struggled with my increasing limitations, I never even entertained the idea that anyone could ever be interested in me — not to kiss me, not to hold my hand while we walked through the mall, not to cuddle, not to call me “girlfriend” or “go steady,” not to live with me, not to propose to me and certainly not to legally commit to be stuck with me for the rest of their life. Who the hell would want that? I was a burden; my health was growing worse; they would have to help take care of me, and I wouldn’t be able to contribute to the household enough to count as an equal. So obviously, I wasn’t on the market. It never even got as far as whether or not I wanted to be: it was simply a matter-of-fact acknowledgement of a reality that would never change, and thus there was no point wasting energy trying to change it.
All this is to say that I wasn’t dreaming of changing my name as part and parcel of the supposedly-universal little girl’s dreams of wearing white and being pampered and fawned over and having pretty pictures taken in rolling green fields. I never had those dreams. I just really fucking hated that name.
So before changing my name as part of an adult relationship ever became a possibility, I had three names to contend with. My father’s name (which I’ve never officially carried), my mother’s maiden name, and that other man’s name.
And not a single one of them was a name I wanted any part of.
My father’s name? Sounded pretty cool phonetically, but it was the name of a man who threatened to beat my mother, cheated on her pretty openly during their short relationship, had some pretty serious class bigotry going on, and was by all accounts — including those of his other children, the half-siblings who wanted nothing to do with me — a complete asshole. Yes: there’s a name I want to adopt!
My siblings (on my mother’s side) actually shared a completely different name — they were from a different father — my mother’s severely abusive first husband who thankfully died in a motorcycle crash, and every single member of my family is convinced it was for the better.
And then there’s my mother’s maiden name. The name shared by my aunt and uncle and family up in Oregon, the name I was born with, the name I went by for my first five years of life.
It doesn’t matter. I don’t fucking want it.
I want nothing to do with any of those names. I grew up in a severely emotionally controlling and manipulative family and experienced abuse to the point that I am just being introduced to the idea that I may have PTSD by my counselor. (I protested, and she said “OK, well, we don’t have to put a name to it, but…”) I have pretty bad dissociative issues I am only just beginning to explore; I escaped with moderate to severe anxiety disorder and panic attacks that don’t qualify as panic disorder only because instead of being random, they are triggered by contact with my family. I fit every other qualification.
I was stuck at home with a mother who afforded me no space to develop an individual self, unable to make it on my own away from her because of my disability. I couldn’t work, couldn’t afford rent, couldn’t live independently. I pushed myself to return to college earlier than I should have — after I dropped out the first time and spent months housebound — cutting short my recovery time, just to get away from her. I lived for a year on Social Security disability (after I was approved), $7500 in needs-based college grants and several thousand more in student loans before everything started to run out — money, my ability to continue school and maintain grades high enough in a busy enough schedule to qualify for further student aid — and I couldn’t stay out on my own anymore.
And then I spent a very painful and traumatic six months stuck in close contact with an abusive mother who was keenly aware that she was losing her grip on me and escalated the abuse accordingly.
And then? I was able to move 2500 miles the hell away from all that shit to live with… a man. Whom I married. And whose name I took.
I was able to move to a place I wanted to move to, to live with this amazing person I wanted to live with, who loved me dearly, who was respectful and affectionate and treated me like a whole person, a person of my own whom he just so happened to be enamored with, whose family was warm and welcoming and accepting and easy to be around…
I was able to choose where I wanted to be, who I wanted to be there with, who I wanted to be, what sort of life I wanted to live…
I chose the family I wanted to be a part of. I built the life I wanted to live. It’s a life I just so happen to love deeply, a life that has given me so much more opportunity than I ever had on the other side of this country, thanks to the person I chose to build it with.
That person? Is a man.
I took his name.
I don’t think that’s a capitulation to patriarchy. I don’t think that’s a compromise of my feminism. I think that is a demonstration of my feminism.
I have a name now. It is mine.














WildlyParenthetical
| Sunday, November 1, 2009 | 10:49 pmThanks for sharing your story, Amandaw. I’m sorry it was so awful for so long, but I am glad of the change your changed name signifies. I am glad that you have the love and care and life you ought to have always had.
Family names solidify and legalise some pretty poisonous relationships, some of the time. That the nuclear family is a site of damage and brokenness probably more often than it’s a site of support and sustenance is something that I think gets lost sometimes, in the discussion of the significance of the name, and in the question of what counts as challenge and what counts as not.
I like my surname. It’s the name of a Celtic prince who fought the invading Romans back, and won by uniting a whole bunch of tribes. He fought after being blinded in battle. And his insignia is all kinds of awesome. It’s also been massively anglicised, which is kinda a shame. It’s also interesting, because it’s my father’s name, and his father’s name, and his father’s father’s name, despite the fact that these Celts were more inclined to track parentage matrilinearly (invasion, colonisation and the imposition of other, more patriarchal senses of economy prevailed, unfortunately). Interestingly, the name comes from the same place as my mother’s mother’s maiden name. And I’ve published with it, lived with it, spelled it out to everyone, modelled pronunciation to most people, squeezed it into boxes on forms, answered questions about where it’s from, giggled over mispronunciations of it, and been bound to my siblings in school by it, for all of my life. It’s bound to me now; all that time and care and love done with it (not only by me) has made it mine. I think it very very unlikely I’ll marry, but if I do, there’s no way I’m giving up that awesomeness.
Stories matter, precisely because they’re different, because they have to engage differently. Yay for you for telling yours.
OuyangDan
| Monday, November 2, 2009 | 12:11 amThat is…beautiful.
It isn’t a capitulation to patriarchy.
It’s a tribute to you. To what you have, to what you made…to what you worked for. It’s yours.
lilacsigil
| Monday, November 2, 2009 | 12:33 amI agree that this is an excellent reason to choose your husband’s name, and is not a compromise of your feminism. However, the system that makes it easy for you to choose to take the name of your husband is the same system that made it hard for you and your mother to choose not to keep the name of her husband. The fact that you are a woman wanting to take the name of a man that you married doesn’t make you less feminist – it means that you are taking advantage of an offered privilege, a privilege which has cause you harm at other times. Like other privileges, it not your fault, but it’s not neutral either. If you had fallen in love with a woman, or a transman in the states where he cannot be officially male, if you and your husband traded genders, you might not have this privilege, or have to pay for it, as you couldn’t do as a child. It doesn’t hurt to be aware of that.
EKSwitaj
| Monday, November 2, 2009 | 4:36 amThank you for sharing this. It’s a very powerful story and an important reminder of why there is no simple formula for how to live a feminist life.
Keri
| Monday, November 2, 2009 | 7:21 amWhat an excellent post. I’m so glad I read it.
kaninchenzero
| Monday, November 2, 2009 | 8:21 pmI got married, legally, to another woman in Texas and took her last name when I did. When I’d changed my name as part of my transition, I’d taken my toxic grandmother’s name as my middle name (my first name is a version of another grandmother’s name) partly to keep my initials the same, partly in hopes she’d appreciate the gesture (she didn’t), and partly because I liked the name and used it some in reference to my top/dominant space.
When I got married I had the opportunity to change my name again without a lot of fuss (apparently Texas family law allows anyone to change their name at the time a marriage license is filed) so I did, jettisoning the toxic grandmother’s name, moving my maiden name up to middle and taking my wife’s last name.
I don’t think we even discussed the wife taking my name.
I would be resentful as shit if this were described as my taking advantage of an offered privilege. We were able to marry legally because bigots here in Texas took away the right of heterosexual trans people to marry but they couldn’t take away all trans people’s right to marry anyone — it’s an unintended consequence of overt oppression. We took advantage of that.
amandaw
| Monday, November 2, 2009 | 8:30 pmOh, I agree.
What I find problematic is the idea that keeping the name I had before I married is somehow the only feminist choice available, or at least more feminist than changing it.
It is a privilege. There is no doubt whatsoever about that. I am afforded privilege by taking the name of the man I married, by sharing a single name with him, in the future by my children sharing the name we share. There’s a reason I was able to change that name easily enough, whereas changing my name upon acquisition of majority would have been a difficult process had I been so inclined. There’s a reason my husband changing his name would have been a difficult process had we been so inclined (we both rather like his family, so we saw no reason to do so). (I do admire couples who change their name together when they commit.)
There’s also privilege in being in a heterosexual monogamous relationship, having had the wedding and signed the papers, and in being relatively “boring” and conforming people. Huge privilege. And that’s no matter what name we had or what our politics or personal beliefs are — that’s not what privilege is about.
But again: what I’m addressing is this idea that the only choice that fits in feminist theory is that of retaining the name you had before you legally committed. I think it’s fairly clear given my situation that it’s rather more respectful of my autonomy and personhood as a woman to have changed my name than to have kept any of the names that were part of my life before I met my husband. And it doesn’t fit into the “capitulation” framing; I accepted a privilege, definitely: but as far as theory and systemic analysis go, it was rather the opposite of capitulating my autonomy and separate personhood as a woman — it was actually a rather fundamental element of developing both those things.
lilacsigil
| Monday, November 2, 2009 | 9:37 pmbut as far as theory and systemic analysis go, it was rather the opposite of capitulating my autonomy and separate personhood as a woman
Yes, I absolutely agree that there is a difference between taking advantage of an offered privilege and “capitulating”! Every option should be equally available, and being feminist should not mean refusing the one that currently is.
BD
| Tuesday, November 3, 2009 | 3:05 pmThanks for sharing this! I made the same decision when I changed my name, and this last part rings true for me – even though I had one of those happy childhoods:
I was able to choose where I wanted to be, who I wanted to be there with, who I wanted to be, what sort of life I wanted to live…
I chose the family I wanted to be a part of. I built the life I wanted to live. It’s a life I just so happen to love deeply, a life that has given me so much more opportunity than I ever had on the other side of this country, thanks to the person I chose to build it with.
That person? Is a man.
I took his name.
Interesting posts, weekend of 11/28 « Feminists with Female Sexual Dysfunction
| Saturday, November 28, 2009 | 8:49 pm[...] Names – About growing up with your last name and taking on your partner’s when you marry. Yeah that sounds about right to me… Even if I were to change my name now, and take my mother’s maiden name – her maiden name is tainted with an abusive father, too. My maiden name is overrated. [...]
liz
| Saturday, December 19, 2009 | 4:09 pmGreat post and a very interesting topic.
I know a number of women who have struggled with the question of a surname. I have had three in my life and I have never been married.
There was my abandoning alcoholic father’s surname that I was given at birth. I then grew up with my grandparents who had a different last name from mine. I was close to my grandfather despite the fact that he drank and screwed around on my Grandmother. I considered taking his last name for a while, but could not stomach it, considering what he put her through and considering the fact that he was inherently a much weaker person than she. Then my mother remarried and my stepfather adopted me and I had his name, despite the fact that we did not love each other and his family meant nothing to me.
So when I was in my twenties I did a legal name change to my Grandmother’s maiden name. I did this because she and her five sisters, all from a small fishing community and the wives of fishers, therefore left to run things for the majority of the year, were and remain some of the strongest, most resilient and generous human beings I have ever known. They remain steadfast role models for me and despite the fact that they all took their husband’s names, I relate my name to their unmarried selves. Also, their father, my Great-grandfather is enough of a mystery to me that he has not tainted the name for me.
It’s a hard choice in a patrilineal culture where most of the men don’t deserve to pass on their name to anyone.