Why am I so damn mean?
(Optional background: my previous post and this comment to it.)
Yeah. I can be. I get angry.
I never used to. Ask my best friend. He’ll tell you. I was an appeaser. I was someone who was always sweet, always accommodating, always ready to be the mediator in a conflict, trying to reason with both sides, trying to placate the opposite party, making sure I never, ever said anything rudely, shortly, bruskly, or in any way that might put off the other party.
I still do that sometimes. When I have the time, energy and inclination.
But I don’t have time or energy anymore. Period. I have twenty things to do every day and only enough spoons for four of them. And that’s the basics: shower, prepare food, work (oh God, work), feed the cats, pay the bills, get ready for bed.
I participate in this community to varying extents at different times, depending on my time, energy and inclination. Sometimes I spend “spoons” here when I should be spending them watching hockey with my husband, or getting that extra half hour of sleep so I won’t fall over at work tomorrow. Sometimes I just have spare time and this is where I choose to spend it.
I feel like I can learn something here and also teach something here. I can do something. Make something happen. Be effective. Even if I only affect three people. Three is more than I would affect watching daytime court TV shows.
I don’t have much to spend here. I never do. What I want to be able to do is spend time researching, considering, organizing, compiling, refining, presenting. I want to be able to do more neutral-tone, resourced, annotated type posts.
I want to be able to profile the CCA. To explain what its goals are and why it is needed. To explain what is happening with it (currently, it’s dead because the current session of Congress is almost over) and what we can do to move it forward (right now, the first thing we can do is raise awareness of it so that more people can push for it because it will continue to go nowhere if the only grassroots support it has is from the likes of ADAPT).
Right now? I do not have the energy for that. Or the time. No matter how much inclination I have.
In the meantime, I watch the way things go in this community that I am a part of. And sometimes, the way things go makes me angry, as I watch it and it continues, over and over, to follow the same patterns, even as people raise their voice and point out the problems — and sometimes get shouted down for it — even as people demonstrate how it might go differently — and are summarily ignored by the people who hold the power in this community — and basically consigned to their corner, where they will continue to do the hard work they are dedicated to (and sometimes burn out because there is so much to be done and so little support) while nobody knows about it, because of a combination of a) the people with the power/audience don’t see fit to tell anyone or direct anyone their way or hell, maybe pick up and help out with some of that workload themselves? and b) the audience themselves don’t have the inclination to seek out the cornered-folks themselves, if they even have the inkling that they exist (because nobody is omniscient).
And you know what? That does make me angry.
So maybe I profile the CCA. And people who care about disability already learn about it (if they didn’t already know). And, because it isn’t “a women’s issue,” or because it doesn’t affect them directly so they don’t quite feel the same urgency, or because the culture is such that non-abled priorities are devalued so it ends up so far down the list of things to get to that it will never get gotten-to … feminist bloggers don’t say anything about it.
And … ?
So I get angry, and I wish that those bigger feminist bloggers would pick up on it, because it is a women’s issue, it does affect a great many people quite seriously, and it is something that they could make a serious difference with if they were to pick up on it, because it quite desparately needs a wider base of support.
And maybe I go the plaintive, appeasing, email-or-post-with-a-”Please-will-you-address-this?”-plea. Because that would be less offensive. (More effective? I don’t think so. I don’t think either way is more effective than the other, in the end: maybe you get people angry at you when you show anger with them, but maybe you’re also quite likely to be completely overlooked if you don’t get someone’s attention — because the whole problem is that they aren’t paying attention to you as you’re doing things the “right” way!)
Or maybe, it is an injustice that this issue ends up ignored by abled-feminist leaders, and it is legitimate to be angry about that, and it is legitimate to call them out on it.
Maybe, they didn’t know about it. That’s just how life goes. But maybe, the reason they don’t know about it is because of the systemic devaluation of non-dominant priorities. Maybe, the reason they don’t know about it is because they are continuing to — sometimes unconsciously, sometimes consciously — value their concerns over the concerns of people not like them. And passing over articles that detail issues that profoundly affect women because they don’t affect women like them. Don’t kid yourself and say that’s not why: they didn’t sit there and think to themselves while curling their moustaches, “Ha ha! These women are not like me, so they can go jump in a river for all I care! Stupak is more important!” But they just didn’t see the relevance — because our culture devalues disabled concerns!
That is what I am trying to change!
And one way to do that is to point out to people when they make those value judgments! Even in error! Even unintentionally! Because intentional or not, women are still being forced into institutions because of it!
Can I get a little angry about that sometimes?
Don’t you think it points out the root problem fairly effectively to point out that subconscious devaluation rather than just profiling the legislation at issue? Isn’t that also a valid problem to point out?
In general: when I’m short on time and energy, I’m a lot likelier to be short in response, too. I’m a lot likelier to just spit out my point rather than trying to go back, pad things with explanations of why and disclaimers about how I know you aren’t a Bad Person and reaching out my hand to hold yours through the process. Sometimes I feel like doing that. Sometimes that’s a valuable thing to do.
But it’s not always the most effective thing to do. And either way, it’s not what should be required of someone — I am a woman with a disability, remember — before they can point out that someone’s stepped on their toes.
Sometimes I’m mean.
I wish I weren’t mean as often as I am. And sometimes I slip up.
But that doesn’t mean that it’s never acceptable, or effective, to be mean. That sometimes, being mean isn’t what is merited given the situation.
I will continue to engage with this community to the extent and in the manner that I choose. If you don’t like my style, that’s OK. Not every person is required to be compatible with every other person’s style of communication. There are other people doing similar work without my sometimes-rude bent on it. I encourage you to seek them out. You are entitled to engage to the extent and in the manner you choose.
But please do not try to attack the legitimacy of this style altogether. Because it is a valid style, a sometimes effective style, and a needed style. We need all sorts of people to make this movement work. We need all sorts of tactics. We need people who are willing to kick a few people in the ass. And we need people who are willing to hold hands and guide gently. And we need people who can explain the simple facts. And we need people who can pull those facts apart and figure out what they might mean.
We’ve all got different roles. This is mine. If you are not comfortable engaging with this style, OK. Engage elsewhere. But don’t tell me to stop engaging. Because I refuse, absolutely refuse to dial back on calling people out for doing shit that is ultimately harmful.
There are some very important tasks at hand, and I’m willing to do some of the work. The work that I can do. It might not be much work, or the most effective work, but it’s what I can do, and it’s still something to help get these very important things done.
Don’t downplay the importance of that. Don’t even.














Static Nonsense
| Monday, December 21, 2009 | 8:36 pmThank you so much for this. Honestly it’s reading entries like this that help me feel better about how I write, respond to situations, etc. Because you’re right – sometimes playing the meek one doesn’t work and the words get skimmed over. And then things don’t get done, and how useless is that?
Cheryl Trooskin-Zoller
| Monday, December 21, 2009 | 10:25 pmI read your previous post before that comment was posted, or I would have responded there.
the “tone argument” is a well-known way the white mainstream silences the voices of people of color, and I think you’re right that some of that is happening here. Any time a minority says to a group with more social/political power, “where have you been? we need you!” and then give examples, the more-empowered group gets all whiny about the uppity “tone.” That’s not constructive criticism you’re hearing. That’s able-bodied privilege trying to put you in your place.
I hear you when you say you’d also like to do more neutral-toned articles if you just had the spoons. You might reach a different audience that way, it’s true. But, as you point out, you might also find that there’s no actual space between “too nice, ignored” and “not nice enough, got the tone argument.” They’re just shoving their discomfort with the whole situation back onto you & insisting it’s *your* fault we’re not comfortable with (or can’t see) our own privilege.
For what it’s worth, you reached me. With exactly your style. Your anger humbles me, inspires me, and yes, teaches me. It does take different approaches to reach different people, and yours definitely reached me. Thank you — for this post, for all your posts.
annaham
| Tuesday, December 22, 2009 | 1:04 amYou win an internet for this post; would you like a LOLcat or other LOLcritter as a prize?
RMJ
| Tuesday, December 22, 2009 | 9:56 amTone arguments are never rhetorically appealing, ever. While tone is an important consideration in writing, it’s only of consideration to the writer and what THEY want to get across. That comment was not cool, particularly considering that that post practically spoonfed education and gave specfific points as to what the writers singled out should also focus on.
OuyangDan
| Tuesday, December 22, 2009 | 12:16 pmI think we should award her both, because this has got to be a fucking record!
And a bingo card, annaham. We totes dropped the ball on that.
She wins an internet tradition!
sophiefair
| Tuesday, December 22, 2009 | 5:59 pmthank you for your anger. i need it. i spend my days being “nice” and accomodating and trying to explain things to people in a “kind” way. because, well, most of the clueless folks are my family and friends and they are trying (perhaps not as hard as i would like). and i need them. and i am scared of the consequences if i really let loose.
but.
you remind me that i have a right to be angry. that i am not wrong about the things that bother me. that there is an intersection between the sexism that i face as a woman and the ableism that i face as a disabled person. that damnit, some things and some people sometimes suck, and we should have a space to yell about that.
so thank you. i consider this post, and your blog a gift.
Urocyon
| Wednesday, December 23, 2009 | 10:55 amExcellent post. I appreciate your candor.
The comment was, indeed, a great example of the “tone argument”. Sometimes anger is well earned, and the most appropriate response. I know I still fall into sugar coating things too much, when it only detracts.
Love the “i thought you were supposed to be my ally” tag, BTW!
thetroubleis
| Thursday, December 24, 2009 | 9:08 amI really love when a tone argument is left on someone’s personal blog.
I think we’ve all been very nice for a very long time, begging for crumbs and that doesn’t seem to be working.
Comrade PhysioProf
| Sunday, December 27, 2009 | 7:29 pmBeing pissed off is totally underrated.
BTW, here via Feministe SSPS.
Wednesday Link Love « The Feminist Texican
| Wednesday, December 30, 2009 | 12:02 pm[...] Rivers Fog: Why am I so damn mean? Or maybe, it is an injustice that this issue ends up ignored by abled-feminist leaders, and it is [...]